|
LCD or plasma?
TV screens that hang on the wall present consumers with new choices 04/03/2003
We may not have flying cars yet, but the new millennium has
at least brought us televisions that hang on the wall. Prices for thin, flat, high-definition monitors are finally
dropping from the stratosphere into a somewhat more affordable
realm. Some are now under $5,000. At the same time, shoppers have more choices. Until
recently if you wanted that wide, oh-so-cool hanging display
for your living room, only one technology could deliver –
plasma. But now, liquid crystal displays, or LCDs, are rapidly
entering the large-format television marketplace. Which is better? The experts are somewhat divided. Largely, they say, it
depends on the quality of the panel manufacturing. Today, a
well-made LCD can rival the performance of plasma in many
areas where it has been traditionally inferior. "There are so many different choices now, it's really
making it harder for the consumers," says video analyst Paul
D. Semenza, executive vice president of the research firm
ISuppli/Stanford Resources. "They really have to read up."
Plasma screens had owned the large flat-panel television
market because manufacturing techniques made it easier to
fabricate big sheets of the display material. LCDs dominated
notebook and desktop computer markets because they were easier
to produce in smaller dimensions. "Up until a year ago, the largest LCD you could get was 20
inches or so, and that wasn't large enough to get into the
big-screen business," says Marty Zanfino, product development
manager for Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America, which is
producing both plasma and LCD televisions. But things are changing rapidly, Mr. Zanfino says. Within
two years, Samsung plans to produce a 52- or 54-inch LCD
monitor. The largest plasma screen now available measures 63
inches diagonally. As LCDs get bigger and plasma screens get smaller, the two
technologies may find a common battleground at about 40
inches, experts say. At that size, consumers could be forced
to decide between LCD or plasma screens costing exactly the
same. Prices are already moving in that direction, says Mr.
Zanfino. Last year, a 32-inch Sony plasma screen cost about
$6,000, while a 30-inch Sharp LCD unit was priced at $7,000.
This year, either can be purchased for about $5,000. And Gateway has thrown the plasma industry for a loop by
releasing a lower-definition, 42-inch plasma monitor priced at
$2,999. Each technology has its advantages and drawbacks. Here's a
rundown of some of the main comparison points: Motion: Plasma monitors produce images and colors by
electrically charging small pockets of gas arranged between
two panes of glass. LCDs work by forcing light though tiny
shutters that open and close rapidly. Because gases can
respond more quickly than the LCD shutters, plasma does a
better job of showing fast-motion video, experts say. Although
LCDs are getting better, gamers and high-end videophiles may
notice ghosting and other distortions when the action on the
screen gets fast and furious. Color: Neither plasma nor LCD can produce the deep
black colors available from traditional TVs based on cathode
ray tubes. But the way they produce color can lead to
noticeable differences. Plasma cells produce their own light.
They glow when electrically charged. Therefore, says Mr.
Zanfino, plasma tends to produce brighter whites and slightly
more vivid colors. Crispness: If you plan on hooking your computer into
the display, an LCD usually shows intricate text more clearly.
Heat: Here's where LCDs have a definite advantage.
Plasma screens require more than twice the amount of
electricity used by LCDs. The continuous charging of plasma's
phosphor gases also produces heat, forcing manufacturers to
outfit their sets with fans. Sometimes the sound of the fan is
loud enough to irritate viewers in a quiet room. "Late at night when the house is quiet is when you notice
them the most," says Mr. Zanfino. "People who have them in
their bedrooms tend to notice them more than those who have
them in a noisy living room." Burn-in: As it ages, phosphor tends to get dimmer,
which can create permanent ghosting. Leaving a video game
displayed on a plasma TV for long periods could permanently
etch images into the display. LCDs are less susceptible to
burn-in. Weight: Advantage LCD. Plasma screens are made with
heavy glass plates. The technology requires more wiring and
equipment to be packed inside the panel encasement. Plasma
screens can weigh 100 pounds or more, making them hard to
transport for servicing. Even the largest LCDs weigh 20
percent less than plasma screens of similar size. Viewing angle: More competition within the LCD television market is on the
way, says Mr. Semenza. And that, he says, is good news for
consumers. "It's really just the beginning of what's going to be quite
an aggressive push in products," he says. "I think we're going
to see continued price drops from here on out." |